I have written before about both the good advances in technology, and the negative consequences of some of those developments. Here are a few more methods high tech methods that law enforcement uses, and occasionally misuses, in its investigations.
A Stingray is a brand of international mobile subscriber identity (IMSI) catcher, also known as a cell-site simulator. Each cellphone has an ISMI, a unique number usually comprising 15 digits that is stored in the SIM card. Stingrays are used by law enforcement and the military to locate individual cell phones by simulating or mimicking the strongest nearest cell site. The user’s phone connects to the Stingray because it offers the strongest signal. The IMSI catcher then maintains that signal connection until law enforcement tracks the location of the cell phone of the unsuspecting user. The use of such devices is highly secret and controversial because it is used without first obtaining a warrant from a judge, and rarely does the person or his attorney know that such a device was used. In addition, there is evidence that some of these devices can capture conversations or text messages which require judicial authorization.
Not only can a person’s cell phone conversations or text messages be intercepted through a judicially approved Title III wiretap, they can also be used to physically track or monitor the user’s location and travels. Mobile phone providers maintain and store records of which cell towers the phone uses while turned on. The person does not have to be calling or texting for this feature to record the movement of the phone. Law enforcement can obtain the historical records from the provider of the location of the specific cell towers and triangulate the user’s location or travels. Whether the police need a warrant, rather than simply a subpoena, to obtain this information is presently being decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.
With a warrant, agents can place a GPS tracking device on a person’s car that records in real time the exact movements of the vehicle 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Since police do not need to physically follow the vehicle, the person being surveilled remains completely unaware.
In 2014, the FBI’s Next Generation Identification (NGI) program became fully operational. The database contains almost 30 million photos. In addition, the FBI has access to some states’ driver’s license photos, State Department’s visa and passport database and the Department of Defense. The FBI program claims to have an 85% accuracy rate when using images of people facing forward with no more than 15 degrees off the center axis. Private companies, such as Facebook and Google, claim accuracy rates of 98%. Thus, this technology is quickly advancing to where there will be ever expanding databases of citizens’ photos that subject them to identification from video surveillance cameras, social media posts, government databases and other media.
This technology uses a network of microphones to detect a gun’s unique explosive sound and then triangulates the source of the sound using GPS. Microphones are placed strategically around many cities and neighborhoods to capture the sound of gunshots and can even turn cameras toward the direction of the shots in an attempt to capture photos of the people involved. New York, Chicago and Washington D.C. have programs that identify and locate gunshots in real time.
Smart Home Devices
Smart home devices like Alexa, Amazon Echo and Google Home record not only a person’s requests and search history, they can also record ambient sounds in one’s home. Police have obtained warrants attempting to compel Amazon and others to turn over the recordings for murder investigations. Devices that make life easier and safer, can be used by law enforcement to investigate criminal activities. Security cameras, smart doorbells with video capabilities, remote access devices, all have the ability to provide law enforcement with recordings or a timeline of use and activities that can be used as evidence against the homeowner or others.
Our computers and smart phones contain an unimaginable amount of personal information about our daily activities and lives. Law enforcement search and download suspects’ computers and phones daily in all type of investigations. Unlike searches for physical evidence such as guns, drugs, counterfeit currency and like that require only the seizure of those specified items, searches of electronic devices are typically much more intrusive. Police typically seize the devices and their tech people make forensic copies of the hard drives and databases. Within those downloads there may be gigabytes of irrelevant, but highly personal information, that law enforcement has no legitimate reason to examine.
Stahl Criminal Defense Lawyers aggressively defend individuals charged with complex federal and state crimes. Founder Robert G. Stahl is recognized as one of the top criminal defense attorneys in the NY/NJ area for his skills, knowledge and success. To contact us to discuss your case, call 908.301.9001 for our NJ office and 212.755.3300 for our NYC office, or email us at email@example.com